|
Post by animex75 on Oct 13, 2013 18:15:12 GMT 12
Never said anything about the gunshot luring him to the wardrobe, just into the room. The culprit merely had to make some noise, such as that muffled noise.
|
|
|
Post by Cloud on Oct 13, 2013 19:57:38 GMT 12
Hey ninjas.... repeat this statement in red: "Maria Ushiromiya is not a murderer."
|
|
|
Post by NinjasPlayCardGames2 on Oct 14, 2013 5:48:16 GMT 12
So, there are plenty of guns lying around... While Battler was opening the wardrobe, the accomplice discharged a gun. This distracted Battler, allowing for the culprit, inside the wardrobe, to shoot him. The culprit inside the wardrobe was restrained, they couldn't have discharged a gun at the time, even if they had one, which they didn't.
|
|
|
Post by NinjasPlayCardGames2 on Oct 14, 2013 5:50:08 GMT 12
Hey ninjas.... repeat this statement in red: "Maria Ushiromiya is not a murderer." You know as well as I do that that's cheating. Neutral or enemy, objective or objectiveless I am not going to repeat. Besides you guys are so close already. Why cheat when you're right there at the finish line? :v
|
|
|
Post by NinjasPlayCardGames2 on Oct 14, 2013 5:52:51 GMT 12
As for Nates Gohda theory, the culprit did not hide in that same room.
|
|
|
Post by Yarn Witch on Oct 14, 2013 6:26:03 GMT 12
So, there are plenty of guns lying around... While Battler was opening the wardrobe, the accomplice discharged a gun. This distracted Battler, allowing for the culprit, inside the wardrobe, to shoot him. The culprit inside the wardrobe was restrained, they couldn't have discharged a gun at the time, even if they had one, which they didn't.If that's the case then The Culprit could not have killed Battler. :v
Or how about, What Battler heard was not a gunshot.
The Culprit shoot about in the wardrobe, causing something heavy to fall from above and strike Battler with a killing force
|
|
|
Post by NinjasPlayCardGames2 on Oct 14, 2013 7:09:37 GMT 12
The culprit inside the wardrobe was restrained, they couldn't have discharged a gun at the time, even if they had one, which they didn't. If that's the case then The Culprit could not have killed Battler. :v
Or how about, What Battler heard was not a gunshot.
The Culprit shoot about in the wardrobe, causing something heavy to fall from above and strike Battler with a killing force The culprit killed Battler.
Battler did hear a gunshot from behind before he died.
No traps were involved.
|
|
|
Post by NinjasPlayCardGames2 on Oct 14, 2013 7:11:48 GMT 12
Battler felt something heavy collide with his head after the gunshot.
|
|
|
Post by Yarn Witch on Oct 14, 2013 7:20:54 GMT 12
The culprit shook the wardrobe over onto Battler, killing him?
This is really basic, but.. :I Despite being restrained, the Culprit was still able to act and move in some fashion, though minimized.
|
|
|
Post by NinjasPlayCardGames2 on Oct 14, 2013 7:26:20 GMT 12
NO! The culprit couldn't do jack.
|
|
|
Post by Yarn Witch on Oct 14, 2013 7:27:53 GMT 12
The gunshot Battler heard was the accomplice shooting the culprit, whose body fell onto Battler?
|
|
|
Post by NinjasPlayCardGames2 on Oct 14, 2013 7:29:26 GMT 12
NO!
|
|
|
Post by Yarn Witch on Oct 14, 2013 8:08:52 GMT 12
The Culprit was not in possession of the Murder weapon at the time Battler was killed.
The murder weapon is a natural function of the room.
|
|
|
Post by NinjasPlayCardGames2 on Oct 14, 2013 8:13:37 GMT 12
The Culprit was not in possession of the Murder weapon at the time Battler was killed.
The murder weapon is a natural function of the room. They weren't .
The murder weapon was a gun.
|
|
|
Post by Yarn Witch on Oct 14, 2013 8:21:13 GMT 12
Battler was struck and killed by the recoiling gun.
The culprit and the accomplice share the same split personality (perhaps they take turns as that person), and the accomplice, as the split-personality-culprit, fired the gun from outside the room.
|
|
|
Post by NinjasPlayCardGames2 on Oct 14, 2013 8:27:14 GMT 12
NOOOOOOOOOOO
|
|
|
Post by Yarn Witch on Oct 14, 2013 8:28:30 GMT 12
Well... The accomplice fired the gun, making it recoil and hit Battler.
|
|
|
Post by NinjasPlayCardGames2 on Oct 14, 2013 8:47:28 GMT 12
WRONG
|
|
|
Post by Yarn Witch on Oct 14, 2013 9:08:25 GMT 12
Battler was not killed when he was struck from behind, only stunned or knocked unconscious. The gunshot severed the culprit's restraints and they killed him and the accomplice after freeing themselves from the wardrobe.
|
|
|
Post by NinjasPlayCardGames2 on Oct 14, 2013 9:13:38 GMT 12
YES, EFFECTIVE!
|
|