|
Post by NinjasPlayCardGames2 on Oct 4, 2013 15:33:25 GMT 12
WAIT, I have erred! I see it only fair to confirm that: At least one murder occurred outside the mansion.
|
|
|
Post by animex75 on Oct 4, 2013 15:38:26 GMT 12
That does not deny that the first 5 were killed in the study, however I propose that George's death was a separate occurrence to the first 5; perhaps he was killed by a second murderer or he was killed with a different weapon, one that wouldn't make a loud noise like the guns would.
|
|
|
Post by Cloud on Oct 4, 2013 15:45:06 GMT 12
Repeat this statement: There is more than one killer!
|
|
|
Post by Yarn Witch on Oct 4, 2013 15:50:49 GMT 12
In case anyone wonders, After the first twilight murders, there are currently 12 people left on Rokkenjima.
I'd like to propose that George was meeting the Murderer, and was killed. He was not necessarily an accomplice.
|
|
|
Post by NinjasPlayCardGames2 on Oct 4, 2013 15:55:03 GMT 12
Repeat this statement: There is more than one killer! I cannot.
|
|
|
Post by Yamon Venzli on Oct 4, 2013 15:57:33 GMT 12
Move aside Fuckers! EVATRICE in the fucking house!
|
|
|
Post by NinjasPlayCardGames2 on Oct 4, 2013 15:57:35 GMT 12
That does not deny that the first 5 were killed in the study, however I propose that George's death was a separate occurrence to the first 5; perhaps he was killed by a second murderer or he was killed with a different weapon, one that wouldn't make a loud noise like the guns would.
George was killed separately. I wont rebut the rest for now.
|
|
|
Post by NinjasPlayCardGames2 on Oct 4, 2013 16:12:00 GMT 12
In case anyone wonders, After the first twilight murders, there are currently 12 people left on Rokkenjima.I'd like to propose that George was meeting the Murderer, and was killed. He was not necessarily an accomplice. George was expecting to meet someone.
|
|
|
Post by Cloud on Oct 4, 2013 16:19:26 GMT 12
Repeat this statement: There are no accomplices!
|
|
|
Post by NinjasPlayCardGames2 on Oct 4, 2013 16:20:26 GMT 12
Repeat this statement: There are no accomplices! I cannot.
|
|
|
Post by Cloud on Oct 4, 2013 16:22:30 GMT 12
Repeat this statement: The person that died outside of the mansion was not George!
|
|
|
Post by NinjasPlayCardGames2 on Oct 4, 2013 16:33:17 GMT 12
Repeat this statement: The person that died outside of the mansion was not George! I cannot you bag of dicks!
|
|
|
Post by Cloud on Oct 4, 2013 16:37:16 GMT 12
Repeat this statement: The gold vault was opened.
|
|
|
Post by NinjasPlayCardGames2 on Oct 4, 2013 17:39:43 GMT 12
The gold vault was opened.
|
|
|
Post by pikajens on Oct 5, 2013 0:21:30 GMT 12
The conversation Krauss, Jessica and Natsuhi had was heard by someone not in that room.
The conversation provided a motive to confront Natsuhi in the study.
|
|
|
Post by animex75 on Oct 5, 2013 1:56:58 GMT 12
The conversation was pertaining to the gold, where it was located, and whether or not it existed.
|
|
|
Post by NinjasPlayCardGames2 on Oct 5, 2013 6:38:06 GMT 12
The conversation Krauss, Jessica and Natsuhi had was heard by someone not in that room.
The conversation provided a motive to confront Natsuhi in the study. No one besides Natsuhi, Krauss and Jessica was aware of the conversation they had before Jessica announced it to the group. The conversation did not lead to a confrontation with Natsuhi anywhere.
|
|
|
Post by NinjasPlayCardGames2 on Oct 5, 2013 6:38:55 GMT 12
The conversation was pertaining to the gold, where it was located, and whether or not it existed. The conversation did not pertain to the gold in any way, shape or form.
|
|
|
Post by animex75 on Oct 5, 2013 7:06:45 GMT 12
The culprit is someone who solved the riddle. Perhaps George met up with said person to search for the location of the vault.
|
|
|
Post by NinjasPlayCardGames2 on Oct 5, 2013 9:13:06 GMT 12
The culprit is someone who solved the riddle. Perhaps George met up with said person to search for the location of the vault. I will not rebut the first. Until the moment of his death, George had no knowledge such a vault exists.
|
|